General Session: Value and Outcomes in Spine Surgery
Presented by: K. Singh - View Audio/Video Presentation (Members Only)
B. Basques(1), P. Louie(1), B. Mayo(1), D. Massel(1), J. Guzman(2), D. Bohl(1), A. Narain(1), F. Hijji(1), K. Singh(1)
(1) Rush University Medical Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, United States
(2) Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, United States
Introduction: Increased surgeon volume may be associated with improved outcomes following surgical procedures. However, there is a lack of information on the effect of surgeon volume on short-term outcomes following anterior cervical fusion (ACF). In this context, the purpose of this study is to identify the association between surgeon volume and inpatient complications, length of stay, and costs associated with ACF.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of ACF patients was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003-2009. Surgeon volume was divided into three categories, volume < 25th percentile, 25th-74th percentile, and ≥75th percentile of surgeon volume. Multivariate regression was used to compare the rates of adverse events, hospital length of stay, and total hospital costs between surgeon volume categories.
Results: A total of 419,212 ACF patients were identified. The 25th percentile for volume was 5 cases per year, and the 75th percentile for volume was 67 cases per year. Volume < 25th percentile was associated with increased rates of any adverse event (OR 3.8, p< 0.001), and multiple individual complications including death (OR 2.5, p=0.014), pneumonia (OR 4.4, p< 0.001), sepsis (OR 2.4, p< 0.001), surgical site infection (OR 4.1, p< 0.001), and wound dehiscence (OR 3.5, p< 0.001). Notably, volume ≥75th percentile was associated with decreased rates of any adverse event (OR 0.7, p< 0.001), death (OR 0.6, p=0.028), sepsis (OR 0.5, p< 0.001), and wound dehiscence (OR 0.6, p< 0.001). On multivariate analysis, length of stay was significantly increased by 2.3 days (p< 0.001) for surgeons < 25th percentile of volume and was decreased by 0.3 days for surgeons with volume ≥75th percentile. Hospital costs were $4,569 more for surgeons with < 25th percentile of volume and $1,213 less for surgeons with ≥75th percentile volume.
Conclusions: In this nationally representative sample, surgeons with volume < 25th percentile had significantly increased complications, length of stay, and costs. Conversely, surgeons with ≥75th percentile volume experienced decreased complications, length of stay, and costs.